An Overview On Sanitary Napkins

The first disposable sanitary napkin, made of cotton and gauge, was put together in 1896. It was successfully commercialized in the United States of America in 1921. As the availability of the material shrank, there was a need to find a material that is easily available and cost-effective. Later, wood pulp was incorporated since it is an absorbent material from softwood.

The plastic revolution changed the entire nature of the sanitary napkin. Sanitary napkins began to be made of Super Absorbent Polymer(SAP) as an absorbent material, with Polypropylene(PP) for the back cover. This made it waterproof. The polypropylene top sheet kept it dry. Today’s sanitary napkins are almost entirely from a plastic material. Only a few are natural.

Potential problems of Sanitary napkins :

Hygiene risk: Improvisation led to introducing SAP to increase absorbency, they began to be made of polypropylene(PP) based perforated top sheet and polyethylene sheet as a barrier. This improved its functionality. These products seem innocuous but they may be laced with dioxins, petrochemicals, GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms), and fragrances. When these chemicals come in contact with sensitive skin, tissue may get irritated. Dioxins are carcinogenic in nature hence the risk of cancer increases even at very low levels of exposure. Additives such as fragrances, deodorants, absorbency agents, urea, and formaldehyde enhance the properties but can cause allergies and skin reactions.

Disposability: Polymers in sanitary pads are non-biodegradable materials. This may create many serious problems. Sanitary pads are made of SAP. When these pads are flushed, they block sewage lines as these chemicals absorb all the water in the sewage line. Disposed used sanitary pads cause occupational hazards for waste pickers who use their bare hands to sort out garbage. This is a health hazard. The common practice is to incinerate used sanitary pads. This releases dioxins and furans, creating an environmental hazard.

Affordability: In developing countries, the price of sanitary pads is often prohibitive for most of the population. About 70 percent of Indian women still cannot afford sanitary pads and use unhygienic rags. In a 2012 study on diffusion and adaptation of sanitary pads to the target group, it was found that working status, education, type of home, and monthly household incomes influence the usage of sanitary napkins. The reason behind its cost is the fact that most of the material used is imported from developed places. This ultimately increases the cost of the product.

Structure of sanitary napkins:

There are four functional components of a sanitary napkin: (i) fluid acquisition layer (ii) distribution component (iii) absorbent structure (iv) liquid impervious membrane.

(i) Fluid acquisition layer: A lot of R&D has been done to keep the top surface dry so that it does not cling to the body and fits comfortably. This layer is a perforated film that allows liquid to pass through it quickly into the absorbent structure and stays dry since the fluid is entrapped in the structure. It thus reduces the chance of leakage.

(ii) Distribution component: This component spreads out the fluid, especially in the longitudinal direction, for better utilization of the product. By spreading fluid, it increases the probability of more retention of fluid.

(iii) Absorbent structure: One of the main characteristics of sanitary pads is to absorb body fluid and retain it for a long period of time and avoid backflow under pressure.

(iv) Liquid impervious membrane: This is the last layer. It acts as a barrier to prevent fluid from leaking.

Performance characteristic of sanitary napkin:

Liquid flow through the interface among these three components (top layer, an absorbent layer, and barrier film) and mainly within the absorbent component is the key factor in deciding the performance of a sanitary napkin. To understand the working principle of sanitary napkins we have to consider the flow path of fluid through each layer of a sanitary pad.

As fluid comes vertically in contact with the first layer, it moves across the fluid acquisition layer to the absorbent layer without spreading in the facing layer. Once the fluid reaches the absorbent layer, it spreads and can be held without reversing flow direction.

The first problem in sanitary pads is the interface between the acquisition layer and the absorbent layer. The acquisition layer is mainly made up of hydrophobic fiber and the absorbent layer is composed of hydrophilic fiber so the fluid must get readily transferred from the acquisition layer to the absorbing medium. Transfer of fluid from one layer to another will fail if there is not enough intimate contact between the two layers. Any gap will alter the pattern of flow and liquid may spill and lead to failure of the product.

Almost all sanitary pads use fluffed cellulosic pulp as the core component of the absorbent material. This fluff is prepared by defibrillation of unopened compressed cellulosic boards. There is always a chance of some amount of unopened board which gives heterogeneity to the absorbent material. Therefore, uneven flow and retention of fluid will be different from the rest of the area.

Performance of sanitary pads can be evaluated on fluid retention capacity or the amount of fluid sustained after applying pressure. One factor which affects fluid retention is density. Modern commercial sanitary pads are made from super-absorbent fiber used in compressed and uncompressed form. Density significantly influences the absorption and stability of the product. A highly compressed fiber will expand on absorption whereas, in the case of lightly compressed fiber, it will collapse as a result of absorption. So compression of absorbent material is necessary to maintain its structural integrity.

Choice of raw material:

(i) Fluid transfer layer: The top layer is designed to transfer fluid from the top cover to the immediate secondary layer. An efficient sanitary pad should be dry for comfort. Traditional sanitary pads were of multilayer cellulosic material. Instead of dripping down, fluid tended to remain at or near the surface. This led to discomfort so one proposed solution has been to use thermoplastic fiber. It has been found that at least 20 percent of the fiber should be hydrophilic to provide sufficient capillary attraction to pull the fluid through the cover and provide a dry surface.

(ii) Acquisition and distributing layer: As the absorbent core cannot absorb fluid immediately, so this layer imbibes the fluid, drawing it away from the point of discharge, distributes it laterally, and holds it for the core to absorb. It is generally made up of thermally bonded or air bonded composite non-woven.

(iii) Absorbent layer: The absorbent core of the sanitary pad is generally made up of cellulosic pulp but there have been some changes in the composition. Nowadays, SAP is air-laid with pulp and used to increase absorbency. The position of this polymer is important as it may clog the pore of the structure and restrict absorption of fluid, so the SAP polymer is affixed to tissue and placed between the pulp and back sheet.

(iv) Barrier sheet: The back sheet is a fluid impermeable sheet that prevents leakage, generally made up of polyethylene.

Tests to evaluate performance:

Absorbency test:

This method determines the total absorption capacity of the material. According to the test standard ISO 5405-1980, a sample is laid on a flat level and transparent surface, so that the underside of the pad can be observed. The fluid is to be dripped, at the rate of 15ml per minute, so that 30 ml of the fluid maintained at a temperature of 2702C is poured onto the center of the sanitary pad from a height of approx. 1 to 2 mm. After the napkin has absorbed the full amount of fluid, the standard weight of 1 kg is put above the sample for a minute on the portion where the fluid is absorbed. After that, the back and sides of the pad are observed for fluid flowing up. The reading is recorded.

Fluid Retention capacity:

The measurement of fluid retention is determined by using the standard ASTM D 461. A sample of the pad is to be immersed in the fluid at room temperature for five minutes to completely wet it out. The fluid clogged sanitary napkin is weighted, dried, and reweighed. Fluid retention is calculated as a percentage of dry mass.

Liquid strike through the test:

A drop of test solution is allowed to fall on the sample and the time taken for the solution to transport from the upper layer of the napkin to the inner layers of the sample. This is measured by observing the drop closely so that the dull wet spot is seen on the wet area of the sample. All samples should be conditioned for 24 hours before the tests.

Sanitary pad manufacturers are more interested in increasing the performance of pads by using material derived from crude petroleum. This has negative environmental impacts and is a health hazard.

Designing a sanitary pad safe to health, biodegradable, sustainable, and affordable for lower-income class women has become a challenge. An alternative raw material has to be found to replace these synthetic fibers and polymers.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest